USPTO serial 75217945
PC POINT VIDEO SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PC POINT VIDEO SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Saint-Laurent, Quebec H4N 2G5, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD L DENNISON
DONALD L DENNISON DENNISON MESEROLE POLLACK & SCHEINER612 CRYSTAL SQ 41745 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | video conferencing terminals for establishing visual, audio and data links to parties at different locations via phone lines; video, SVGA and multisync monitors; video cameras; digital cameras; slide converters; speakers; microphones; personal computer-based and hardware based compression-decompression units (codec); keyboards; personal computers; computer programs for video conferencing; infrared key-pads, tablets and pens; graphic tablets; touch recorders and players; video document cameras; slide-to-video converters; CD-ROM players; inverse multiplexers (IMUX); white boards for video conferencing and cabinets for video conferencing equipment | ABANDONED | May 21, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |