USPTO serial 75218291
GALAVU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GALAVU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment in the nature of television programming for hotels and motels, namely, providing a variety of entertainment programs and interactive programs intended for distribution by operators of satellite television broadcast and satellite master antennae services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | telecommunication services in the nature of access to interactive bulletin board systems, on-line interactive computer networks and on-line computer services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Galavu International Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by GALAVU ENTERTAINMENT INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GALAVU
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1998 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 28, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |