USPTO serial 75218322
1 800 THE WAVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, CHERYL SUZANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 1 800 THE WAVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario M5H 3Y2, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID M SILVERMAN
DAVID M SILVERMAN COLE RAYWID & BRAVERMAN LLP1919 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | transmission of data services; provision of access to the Internet and on-line services; provision of content for use on all on-line and Internet services; installation services in respect of the provision of access to the Internet and all on-line services; provision of user support packages and programs for use in connection with access to the Internet and all on-line services; all by means of terrestrial, satellite, wireless or other means of communication | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 15, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |