USPTO serial 75219065
PICK 5
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PICK 5?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Westport, CT
Westport, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
IRAH H DONNER
IRAH H DONNER HALE AND DORR LLPTHE WILLARD OFFICE BLDG1455 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-1008Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 4, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 14, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 14, 1998 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 3, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 15, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |