Drawing for GREENTAC

USPTO serial 75219500

GREENTAC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GREENTAC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAY H BEGLER

JON MICHAELSON HOPKINS & CARLEYP O BOX 1469SAN JOSE, CA 95109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016paper and cardboard materials, namely, paper-based printed and laminated self-adhesive labels, address labels, shipping labels and printed labels not of textile; paper-based laminated tags, stickers and plastic and iron-on transfersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2000ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 30, 2000OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 30, 2000OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Dec 20, 1999OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 9, 1999ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 15, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 16, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 1998UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 15, 19981.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Jan 9, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 18, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 10, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance