USPTO serial 75220908
ENERACTIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENERACTIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | marketing services, namely, the design, development and implementation of a program for electric and natural gas utilities to market, obtain, and retain telecommunications customers and business and specifically excluding the provision of consultation services in the field of energy engineering | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | telecommunication services, namely, long distance telephone services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2001 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 16, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 24, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 21, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |