USPTO serial 75221654
PARADIGM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PARADIGM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAME A SKOCHDOPOLE
JAME A SKOCHDOPOLE CAOLO BELL & NUNNALLY LLP3232 MCKINNEY AVE STE 1400DALLAS, TX 75204-2429UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software programs for physician practice management | ACTIVE | Nov 19, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |