USPTO serial 75221690
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Whitecroft Lighting (Holdings) Limited
Wilmslow, Cheshire SK9 5BX, GB
Other trademarks owned by Whitecroft Lighting (Holdings) Limited
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EVAN M KENT
EVAN M KENT RUSS AUGUST & KABAT12424 WILSHIRE BLVD 13TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | lighting apparatus, installations and units; computer controlled lighting management systems; electronic lighting control apparatus; occupancy detection apparatus to allow automatic switching of lighting and manual override apparatus for use with the aforesaid goods apparatus and instruments for controlling lighting; computers and computer software for use in the control of lighting; low voltage and mains voltage track systems to give flexibility of location and relocation of surface mounted luminaires; systems for pre-programmed automatic testing of emergency invertors and batteries with status feedback to the user; intelligent control systems to optimize power consumption of lighting; electronic transformers; ballasts; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |