USPTO serial 75222099
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD J HANDLER III
EDWARD J HANDLER III KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | components using or containing a virtual process device, namely, computer printers, optical scanners, network interface adapters, microcomputer and host computer systems comprising network interface adapters, data storage units, I/O processing units, facsimile machines, modem and terminal adapters, printers, terminal equipment for recording, processing, converting, transferring and reproduction, namely, word processors, digital video components, and replacement parts for same, computer interface boards, memory cards, software programs for controlling computer drivers, computer programs for telecommunications and applications development | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | telecommunication services, namely, providing frame relay connectivity services containing a virtual process unit for data transfer | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer consultation and computer software design for others, scientific research in the field of data processing | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 17, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 18, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |