USPTO serial 75222256
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs, applications, systems, manuals, design and development tools, for development and management of manufacturing, quality control, accounting, safety, engineering and related factory information technology applications; and the promotion, marketing and sales of such products and services | ABANDONED | Nov 30, 1995 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 1998 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 20, 1998 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| May 11, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |