USPTO serial 75222404
THE COMPANY THAT REINVENTED THE TELEPHONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 18, 2000
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE COMPANY THAT REINVENTED THE TELEPHONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD EUGENE DICK
HERBERT H FINN GREENBERG TRAURIG, PC77 W WACKER DR STE 2500CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | cordless telephones and accessories therefor | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VTECH COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VTECH COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VTECH COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named THE COMPANY THAT REINVENTED THE TELEPHONE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2006 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 5, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 30, 1999 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 6, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 6, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 14, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 5, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |