USPTO serial 75222760
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | seeds for planting, namely, seeds for vegetables, flowers, corn, lawn, turf, sorghum, soybeans, grains, alfalfa, clover, cotton, sunflower, trees, peanuts, grasses, trevoils, cicer milkvetches, millets, buckwheat, rape seed, canola, forage, chicory, kale, turnip, brassicas and wildlife feed | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 11, 1999 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 11, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 11, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 11, 1999 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 3, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 5, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 7, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 1998 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Feb 20, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |