USPTO serial 75223013
GTP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIGELL, CHARLES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GTP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Miriam Claire Beezy
MIRIAM CLAIRE BEEZY MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP11377 W OLYMPIC BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90064UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing and wearing apparel, namely, jackets, warm-up suits and suits, sweatshirts, T-shirts, sports shirts, polo shirts, sweaters, tank tops, sports jerseys and uniforms, headbands, wristbands, shorts, overalls, sweat pants and hats and shoes and athletic footwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 5, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 13, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 24, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 24, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |