USPTO serial 75223119
MEDTV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SARAI, BALDEV
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEDTV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Lowe
DAVID A LOWE BLACK LOWE & GRAHAN PLLC816 SECOND AVESEATTLE, WA 98104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | interactive medical monitoring and diagnostic equipment, namely, a device to interactively couple an electronic medical measuring instrument to an interactive diagnosis controller for analyzing a patient's condition and for then remotely providing instructions to that patient | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 12, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |