USPTO serial 75223185
CELLOMICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 19, 2002
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CELLOMICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PITTSBURGH, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
JANA, DE
Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. Fishman
Michael D. Fishman Rader, Fishman & Grauer PLLC39533 Woodward AvenueSuite 140Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer services, namely, providing molecular and biochemical data via interactive computer data bases | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CELLOMICS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Cellomics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CARL ZEISS JENA GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by Cellomics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BioDx, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BioDx, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CELLOMICS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 9, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 6, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 26, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 25, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |