USPTO serial 75223402
THE CHIEF ASSISTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MERMELSTEIN, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE CHIEF ASSISTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DK-2450 Copenhagen SV, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL B LASKY
MICHAEL B LASKY MERCHANT GOULD SMITH EDELL WELTER ET AL3100 NORWEST CTR90 S SEVENTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | software systems for internal combustion engines, intelligent engine monitoring and analyzing software, software for managing spare parts and engine maintenance; manuals provided therewith | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 1999 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |