USPTO serial 75223426
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MORTON AMSTER
MORTON AMSTER AMSTER ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | remotely controlled wireless or wired interface to establish a communication link between a personal computer and television receiver consisting of a user controlled console, a transceiver adapted to be connected to the personal computer and an audio-video receiver or transceiver adapted to be connected to or built into the television receiver | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2000 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 1999 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 21, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |