USPTO serial 75223508
CALPEP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CALPEP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Melbourne, Victoria 3004, AU
Melbourne, Victoria 3004, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D C ROYLANCE
D C ROYLANCE ROYLANCE ABRAMS BERDO & GOODMAN LLP1225 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-2680UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemicals for use in the manufacture of dental products, dairy products, confectionery and food products; casein and casein complexes for use in the manufacture of dental products, dairy products, confectionery and food products | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | toothpastes, mouth washes, and dentifrices | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | dental floss | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | food products, namely, dairy products, excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; liquid milk; powered milk; dried milk; butter; cheese; yoghurt; edible oils and fats; casein and casein complexes; dairy-based chocolate, cocoa or coffee beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | confectionery; chewing gum; chocolate; chocolate, cocoa or coffee based beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | beverages, namely, mineral and aerated waters; non-alcoholic drinks; fruit drinks and fruit juices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BONLAC FOODS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by BONLAC FOODS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named CALPEP
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 17, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |