Drawing for KLT POWER INTERNATIONAL

USPTO serial 75223759

KLT POWER INTERNATIONAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KLT POWER INTERNATIONAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK E BROWN

MARK E BROWN LITMAN MCMAHON & BROWN LLC1200 MAIN ST STE 1600KANSAS CITY, MO 64105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037planning, development, construction and maintenance of a power-generated facilityABANDONEDJun 1, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 1998ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 19, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 2, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 21, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance