USPTO serial 75223843
2MAIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 2MAIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Businessware of Scandinavia ApS
1260 Copenhagen K., DK
Businessware of Scandinavia ApS
1260 Copenhagen K., DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRANCE D LEMOINE
FRANCE D LEMOINE RUSS AUGUST & KABAT12424 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1200LOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | software for business contact management and software for electronic mailing of brochures and information and dissemination management including processing through web sites on a global computer information network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2001 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 12, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |