USPTO serial 75224612
SLEUTHWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SLEUTHWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles T.J. Weigell
CHARLES T J WEIGELL BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1026UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer consultation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | PRRG | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1998 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 20, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 20, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 25, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 1, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |