USPTO serial 75224677
DIVI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIVI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chapel Hill, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOANNE M DENISON
JOANNE M DENISON DENISON & ASSOC PC150 N WACKER DR STE 1800CHICAGO, IL 60606-1607UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 200 | indicating membership in a group of hotels, resorts and timeshare properties | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Dec 23, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 1998 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 1998 | PRRD | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED | — |
| Mar 25, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 1998 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 1998 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 22, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |