USPTO serial 75225377
PLUGS 'N' WORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLUGS 'N' WORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Peterborough, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer interfacing device which permits for interfacing of an industrial mesurement system or measurement instrument to an industrial control system or graphics display system | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |