Drawing for BRAIN MANAGEMENT

USPTO serial 75225996

BRAIN MANAGEMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLIAMS, IRENE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRAIN MANAGEMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFREY H EPSTEIN

JEFFREY H EPSTEIN COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041providing courses of instruction, educational services in the nature of correspondence courses, publication of books and texts on CD-ROM, all in relation to the study of the enhancement and improvement of brain functions and capabilitiesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 1999ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 22, 1998ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 7, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 9, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 30, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 11, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 21, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 20, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance