USPTO serial 75226407
DIANA DE CARLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHIH, SALLY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIANA DE CARLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN T NASH
BRIAN T NASH SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWISONE PEACHTREE CTR STE 2800303 PEACHTREE ST NEATLANTA, GA 30308-3252Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cologne, perfume, bath gel, bath oil, bath and body powder, beauty masks, body cream, body oil, bubble bath, cold cream, facial cream, skin cream, deodorant soap, skin soap, toilet soap, antiperspirants and deodorants, depilatories, eye makeup, face powder, facial makeup, facial scrubs, foundation makeup, shower gel, hand cream, lipstick, lip gloss, skin moisturizer, nail enamels, nail hardeners, nail polish, nail strengtheners, talcum powder, eye gels, eye makeup remover, makeup remover, eau de toilette, and scented body spray | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |