Drawing for CLOTHCRAFT BY WINDSOR

USPTO serial 75226755

CLOTHCRAFT BY WINDSOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLOTHCRAFT BY WINDSOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BARRY R. LIPSITZ

BARRY R LIPSITZ LAW OFFICE BARRY R LIPSITZ755 MAIN ST BLDG 8MONROE, CT 06468UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing for women, namely, blouses, skirts, sports jackets, women's suits, coats, jackets, scarves, shawls, T-shirts, caps and dressesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 27, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 16, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 10, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2000REINREINSTATED—
Aug 23, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 23, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 15, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 16, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 24, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 23, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 12, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 26, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 1999CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 14, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 13, 1998ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 27, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 25, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 24, 1998ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 13, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 9, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 2, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 1, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 8, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance