USPTO serial 75226857
TLC THE LEARNING CHANNEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TLC THE LEARNING CHANNEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DIANE MARCOVICI PLAUT
ALAN BLUM WHITE & CASE LLP1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Stationery, namely, writing paper, note cards, diaries, pens, pencils, pencil cases, paper stationery portfolios, binders, collector's trading cards, paper party decorations and books and magazines on topics relating to registrant's television programming of the same name all sold in connection with registrant's television network, bearing registrant's television network insignia and sold in registrant's retail stores | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing namely, t-shirts, sweatshirts and hats, all sold in connection with registrant's television network, bearing registrant's television network insignia and sold in registrant's retail stores | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Dolls, namely plush toys, and games namely, multi-activity interactive board games and computer games relating to registrant's television programming, all sold in registrant's retail stores | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Discovery Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named TLC THE LEARNING CHANNEL
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2004 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 25, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |