USPTO serial 75226869
HOME & FAMILY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEORGE, ANIL V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOME & FAMILY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK H TIDMAN
MARK H TIDMAN BAKER & HOSTETLER1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWSTE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5304Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | BLANKETS, NAMELY, BED BLANKETS, THROW BLANKETS, AND AFGHANS; TEXTILE WALL HANGINGS; BED SHEETS; TEXTILE PLACEMATS; TEXTILE NAPKINS; CURTAINS; BATH TOWELS; FABRIC TABLE RUNNERS; POT HOLDERS; DISH TOWELS; AND TABLECLOTHS NOT OF PAPER | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 20, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 18, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 5, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |