Drawing for THE WEB...FOR GROWNUPS

USPTO serial 75227094

THE WEB...FOR GROWNUPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, CHAD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE WEB...FOR GROWNUPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN W CRITTENDEN

JOHN W CRITTENDEN COOLEY GODWARD LLPONE MARITIME PLZ STE 2000SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3580UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035dissemination of advertising for others via an online electronic communications network; online retail services, with a specialization in items for people fifty years of age and olderACTIVE—
042computer services, namely, providing a computer database in the nature of computer bulletin boards and chat rooms, specifically designed for people fifty years of age or older; providing travel agency services, namely, making reservations and booking for temporary lodgingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 7, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 6, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 5, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 19, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 27, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 25, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 13, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 6, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 12, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 21, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance