Drawing for CHRISTMAS ELEGANCE

USPTO serial 75227200

CHRISTMAS ELEGANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHRISTMAS ELEGANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HEIDI L SACHS

HEIDI L SACHS PERKINS COIE1201 THIRD AVE 40TH FLSEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028illuminated wire decorations; artificial Christmas trees and wreaths; Christmas garlands; Christmas ornament card hangers; Christmas tree decorations, namely, ornaments, skirts, stands and stand covers; Christmas wreath hangers and stands, and Christmas ornaments supported by metal rodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 10, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 29, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 30, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 2, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance