USPTO serial 75227516
LIGHTNING BOLT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRUNDY, JUDITH A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIGHTNING BOLT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAUL B EPNER
PAUL B EPNER ILC LICENSING CORP3636 NOBEL SRIVESTE 400SAN DIEGO, CA 92122Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | surfboards; windsurfing boards; skateboards; kneeboards; wakeboards; skimboards, snow skis; snow ski poles; water skis; volleyballs; baseballs; softballs; tennis balls; basketballs; golf balls; footballs; soccer balls; paddle balls; baseball bats; tennis rackets; paddle ball rackets; and toys, namely, board games; toy cars; beach balls, kites and wind socks | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1971 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 26, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 30, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 1998 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 9, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 15, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |