USPTO serial 75227620
ANSER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ANSER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario, L4X 2B7, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SPIRO BEREVESKOS, ESQ.
SPIRO BEREVESKOS ESQ BANK ONE TWR CTRWOODARD EMHARDT NAUGHTON & ET AL111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5137Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | fork lift tires | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |