USPTO serial 75228060
YOUR PURE WATER PROFESSIONALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARD, JENNIFER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YOUR PURE WATER PROFESSIONALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE GOTTLIEB
GEORGE GOTTLIEB GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hinckley & Schmitt, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named YOUR PURE WATER PROFESSIONALS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2000 | PR.W | PETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 16, 1999 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 23, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |