Drawing for YOUR PURE WATER PROFESSIONALS

USPTO serial 75228060

YOUR PURE WATER PROFESSIONALS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 608
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARD, JENNIFER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YOUR PURE WATER PROFESSIONALS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GEORGE GOTTLIEB

GEORGE GOTTLIEB GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032bottled drinking waterABANDONED—
037repair and maintenance of water conditioning and drinking water equipmentABANDONED—
039delivery of bottled waterABANDONED—
040water treatment servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 20, 2000PR.WPETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN—
Jul 16, 1999PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Apr 2, 1999PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 23, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 2, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 1998UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance