USPTO serial 75228443
Serial No. 75228443
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 75228443?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Franklin Park, IL
Franklin Park, IL
FRANKLIN PARK, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DIANE G. ELDER
DIANE G ELDER WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON225 W WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606-1229UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | light beverages, namely, fruit juice and fruit-flavored drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 13, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 1998 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 2, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 1, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |