Drawing for DIVI RESORTS

USPTO serial 75228490

DIVI RESORTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIVI RESORTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOANNE DENISON

JOANNE DENISON DENISON & ASSOCS PC212 W WASHINGTON BLVDSTE 1608CHICAGO, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035business management and business marketing consulting, advertising and sales promotion consulting and accounting services for hotels, resorts, timeshares and casinosACTIVE—
036financial consultation for hotels, resorts, timeshare properties and casinosACTIVE—
042legal consultation for hotels, resorts, timeshare properties and casinosACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 25, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 26, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 4, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 23, 2001ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 4, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 7, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 11, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 11, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 26, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 26, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 6, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance