USPTO serial 75228490
DIVI RESORTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOWRY, LEIGH A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIVI RESORTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chapel Hill, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOANNE DENISON
JOANNE DENISON DENISON & ASSOCS PC212 W WASHINGTON BLVDSTE 1608CHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business management and business marketing consulting, advertising and sales promotion consulting and accounting services for hotels, resorts, timeshares and casinos | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | financial consultation for hotels, resorts, timeshare properties and casinos | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | legal consultation for hotels, resorts, timeshare properties and casinos | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 7, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 11, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 26, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 26, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |