USPTO serial 75228850
WOOL PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WOOL PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY M. LURIA
MARY M LURIA DAVIS & GILBERT1740 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 023 | pure wool yarns, namely yarns for weaving fabrics, machine knitting, hand knitting, handcrafts and carpets | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | wool fabrics, namely, worsted, woolen, knitted and upholstery fabric, bed blankets and bed coverings, namely afghans, bed blankets, bed canopies, bedspreads, comforters, duvets covers, fabric furniture covers, fabric for the manufacture of furniture, quilts, dust ruffles, shams, wall hangings and window curtains | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2001 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 24, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 2, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |