USPTO serial 75229459
CYBER CENTURY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHIH, SALLY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CYBER CENTURY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LANGDON OWENS
LANGDON OWENS PARSONS DAVIES KINGHORN & PETERS185 S STATE ST 7TH FLSALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software, namely, use for education, healthcare management, marketing, strategic planning, news and entertainment and comparative analysis; pre-recorded CD-ROMs and audio and video tapes featuring non-interactive and interactive databanks, music, motivational messages, lectures, readings, games, plays, movies, tests and questionnaires in the fields of communications, telecommunications, broadcasting, computer and information technology and services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 23, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 10, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 14, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 24, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |