USPTO serial 75229848
SMARTLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROBINSON, ELLIOTT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMARTLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROGER P. FUREY
ROGER P FUREY ARTER & HADDEN1801 K ST NW STE 400KWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | wireless telecommunications services, featuring dynamic allocation of wireless bandwidths in response to customer demand | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TELIGENT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Associated Communications, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Associated Communications, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named SMARTLINE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 5, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 17, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 25, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |