USPTO serial 75230226
2 TONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 2 TONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Elizabeth Webbing Mills Co., Inc.
Central Falls, RI
CIT GROUP/COMMERICAL SERVICES, INC., AS AGENT, THE
NEW YORK, NY
Other trademarks owned by CIT GROUP/COMMERICAL SERVICES, INC., AS AGENT, THE
CIT GROUP/COMMERICAL SERVICES, INC., AS AGENT, THE
NEW YORK, NY
Other trademarks owned by CIT GROUP/COMMERICAL SERVICES, INC., AS AGENT, THE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD F PERLMAN
EDWARD F PERLMAN WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS PC600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210-2211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | woven webbing for use as straps for luggage; woven webbing for use as harnesses for animals | ACTIVE | — |
| 022 | woven webbing for use as tie-down straps or for securing or handling bundles or cargo | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | woven webbing for use in the manufacture of clothing straps, luggage and baggage, harnesses, and sporting goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Elizabeth Webbing Mills Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CIT GROUP/COMMERICAL SERVICES, INC., AS AGENT, THE
- Other trademarks owned by CIT GROUP/COMMERICAL SERVICES, INC., AS AGENT, THE
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named 2 TONE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 4, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 22, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |