USPTO serial 75230989
ALEXIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALEXIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R CORBIN HOUCHINS
1201 3RD AVE STE 5100SEATTLE, WA 98101-3269UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | wine | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2000 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 1998 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 1998 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 9, 1998 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |