USPTO serial 75231034
FIELDVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIELDVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta T2P 3R7, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES W MCKEE
JAMES W MCKEE FAY SHARPE BEALL FAGAN MINNICH & MCKEE1100 SUPERIOR AVE STE 700CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for the simplification of field data collection and analysis for both oil batteries and gas facilities and user manuals sold as a unit therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1998 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 8, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |