USPTO serial 75231330
MILLENNIUM AWARDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MILLENNIUM AWARDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DARREN S CAHR
DARREN S CAHR GARDNER, CARTON & DOUGLAS LLCSTE 3700191 N WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606-1698Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services, namely, providing incentives to people to demonstrate excellence in a variety of fields, for others, namely - academic distinction; outstanding athletic achievement; personal excellence; excellence in business; excellence in community service; excellence in government service; achievement in the arts and culture; and achievement in science and technology; entertainment services in the nature of broadcast and live award presentation ceremonies celebrating achievement in a variety of fields, namely - media and entertainment; education and learning; history; heroism and valor; arts and culture; politics and policy; money and finance; science, technology, discovery, invention and exploration; sports and leisure; hobbies and personal pursuits; religion and philosophy; medicine; and popular culture | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 7, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |