Drawing for THE SAW DOCTOR

USPTO serial 75231608

THE SAW DOCTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE SAW DOCTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THEODORE R PAULDING

THEODORE R PAULDING CITYPLACE IIMCCORMICK PAULDING & HUBER185 ASYLUM STHARTFORD, CT 06103-4102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007blades for power tools, namely, blades for band saws, blades for reciprocating sabre or jig saws and hole sawsACTIVENov 7, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 8, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 26, 2000PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 17, 2000SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 17, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 17, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 1999LEXTLATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST—
Dec 13, 1999LSOULATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE—
Dec 9, 1999EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 1999EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 23, 1999EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 1999EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 3, 1999REINREINSTATED—
Jun 3, 1999PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
Jun 2, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 16, 1999PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 25, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 9, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 16, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 14, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 2, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance