USPTO serial 75231667
QORVIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QORVIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN A HUGHES
JOHN A HUGHES TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | advertising services, namely, advertising agency services, promoting the services of others in a wide variety of fields through the distribution of printed, audio and audio-visual promotional materials and by rendering sales promotion advice; placing advertisements for others; production and distribution of radio and television commercials for others; production and distribution of audio and video infomercials for others; product merchandising for others; and business marketing consulting services for others; none of the foregoing to include sales of consumer goods or services under or in connection with the mark at retail or by other via the mail or a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | printing and graphic art design services for others, design services for others in the field of retail sales; none of the foregoing to include sales of consumer goods or services under or in connection with the mark at retail or by other via the mail or a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by QORVIS MEDIA GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Pics Previews, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pics Previews, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named QORVIS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 9, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 21, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |