USPTO serial 75231827
BANPRESTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BANPRESTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RAMI S. YANNI
RAMI S YANNI GRAHAM & JAMES LLP801 S FIGUEROA ST FL 14LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-2573UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | amusement park services; amusement arcade services; gaming services related to coin-operated electronic games; providing entertainment consisting of games, music and movies by means of a global computer network; providing computer software for games, as well as magazines and books for games, music and movies that may be downloaded from a global computer network; providing entertainment information including information regarding games, music and movies by means of a global computer information network; film production, video tape film production and production of television programs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 25, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 28, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1998 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 14, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |