USPTO serial 75232232
SELECO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SELECO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
33170 Pordenone, IT
33170 Pordenone, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES N DRESSER
JAMES N DRESSER ANTONELLI TERRY STOUT & KRAUS LLP1300 N 17TH ST STE 1800ARLINGTON, VA 22209UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | television sets and parts and components thereof, radio receivers, radio gramophones, radio recorders, car radio sets, video and audio recorders, record players, portable gramophones, video and audio cassette players, cartridge turntables, amplifiers, video recorders, cartridge and open reel pickups, stereophonic systems composed of power amplifiers, equalizers, tuners and preamplifiers, stereophonic headphones, line radios for radio broadcastings, radios, monitors, namely, computer monitors and multiscanning monitors, closed circuit television systems comprising telecameras and monitors, telecameras, video intercommunication systems comprising videoconference apparatuses, intercommunication systems comprising microphones, telephones, modems measuring instruments, namely, oscilloscopes, testers, multimeters, frequency meters, teaching audio visual equipment, namely, video and audio players for playing video tapes and audio cassettes apparatuses for language labs, namely, headphones, audio and video recorders for recording video tapes and audio cassettes, audio and video players, cable television receivers, antennae, apparatuses for the distribution of video signals, namely, video signals generators, electrical irons, slot machines operated by means of coils, tokens, bills, cards, tickets and similar means, and components and parts thereof, coin changers, electrical resistors, automatic electrical valves, gas and electrical thermostats, commutators, voltage stabilizers, push-button panels, deflector yokes, printed circuits, micro-circuits, transformers, namely, power transformers, TV flyback transformers, switched mode transformers, condensers, resistances and resistors, potentiometers, television tuners, satellite tuners, CATV tuners, connectors, switches, semiconductors, cathode ray tubes, and timers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 11, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |