Drawing for CONVERGENCE CONNECTIONS

USPTO serial 75233226

CONVERGENCE CONNECTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROBINSON, ELLIOTT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONVERGENCE CONNECTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE M JARVIS

LAWRENCE M JARVIS MCANDREWS HELD & MALLOY LTD500 W MADISON ST 34TH FLCHICAGO, IL 60661UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electronic information and entertainment delivery cables, jacks, wires and systems, namely, telephone jacks, telephone couplers, telephone cords, telephone wires, telephone hubs, data network jacks, data network couplers, data network cords, data network wires, data network hubs, data network concentrators, audio jacks, audio couplers, audio cords, audio wires, audio splitters, audio switches, video jacks, video couplers, video switches, video wires, video cables, video modulators, and video combinersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 26, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 14, 1999EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 16, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 29, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 12, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 20, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance