USPTO serial 75233291
X GEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with X GEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
93000 Saebt, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DOUGLAS T JOHNSON
DOUGLAS T JOHNSON MILLER & MARTINVOLUNTEER BLDG STE 1000832 GEORGIA AVECHATTANOOGA, TN 37402-2289Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | packs, namely, fanny packs; back packs; backpack baby carriers; multi-function backpack baby carriers; luggage; harnesses, namely, harness straps; straps for luggage and handbags; wallets; purses; bags and cases, namely, all purpose sports bags, duffel bags, tote bags, briefcases, briefbags; travel bags and cases | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | men's, women's and children's clothing, namely, gloves, ski gloves, mits, hats, baseballs hats, sun hats, rain hats, winter hats, fur hats, ear bands, ear muffs, scarves, neck tubes, headbands, sweatbands, bandanas, ties, belts, T-shirts, tank tops, sports shirts, muscle shirts, golf shirts, polo shirts, tube tops, halter tops, sport bras, jock straps, underwear, socks, sport socks, swimwear, bathing suits, swimming caps, jackets, coats, rainwear, skiwear, sports jerseys, sport uniforms, sweat shirts, sweat pants, shorts, pants, tights, leg warmers, body suits, racing suits, flight suits, coveralls; footwear, namely, work boots, hiking boots, winter boots, rubber boots, ski boots, snowboard boots | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |