USPTO serial 75233371
LASERLIPOLISI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2824207Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 23, 2004
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LASERLIPOLISI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
50141 FIRENZE, IT
50141 FIRENZE, IT
50141 FIRENZE, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CECELIA M PERRY
CECELIA M PERRY SCARBOROUGH STATIONSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-0827UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Neodymium-- Yag laser system composed primarily of laser source electronic controlling boards, keyboards, and beam delivery system operating at 1064nm, and at different wavelengths, pulsed or not pulsed for medical use; other different laser systems composed primarily of laser source, electronic controlling boards, keyboards, and beam delivery system operating 1064nm, and at a different wavelength, pulsed or not pulsed for medical use; and other non-laser systems generating electromagnetic waves composed primarily of electronic oscillator with controlling boards, keyboards for medical use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | medical services and surgeries relating to beauty medicine, namely, cosmetic and plastic surgery | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 30, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2002 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 4, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 9, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 8, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |