Drawing for SILVERRUN TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 75233945

SILVERRUN TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LYKOS, ANGELA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SILVERRUN TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SALLY M ABEL

SALLY M ABEL FENWICK & W LLP2 PALO ALTO SQ STE 800PALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for use in software development and design; computer software for database modeling and database design; computer software for industry-specific business modeling for use in a variety of industries and niches including data warehousing; computer software for use in object-oriented design and development; computer software for design and generating applications used on a global communications network; and user manuals supplied as a unit therewithACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 19, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 28, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 28, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 5, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 3, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 19, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 21, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance